Electric field, magnetic field, communication High frequency electromagnetic wave Exposure standard comparison

It is the electromagnetic wave exposure standard that it is confused by those who are exposed to the living electromagnetic wave and experience the health abnormality or worry.
It is the part that you are most difficult to understand while talking to Shieldgreen. People are wondering why government and private standards differ so much and reduce the gap to a safe electromagnetic environment.

We will compare the electromagnetic wave exposure standards like this.
1. International organizations 2. Government agencies 3. Local governments 4. Private institutions 5. Nature
We organize the criteria for electromagnetic wave exposure and electromagnetic influence.

We will summarize some of the questions before the standard of electromagnetic wave exposure.
1. Classification of electromagnetic wave exposure
1) Short-term exposure
30 minute exposure standard: Most Western European countries, USA
6 minutes: Canada
3 hours: Russia, China, Italy, Eastern Europe
* Most countries do not specify a long-term exposure period.
2) Long-term exposure
Most of the private sector groups do not specify short-term exposure times.
(Picture: quoted by Korea Broadcasting & Radio Promotion Agency)
* The figures below are compared and analyzed based on short-term exposure.

2. What unit is used in the electromagnetic wave exposure standard?
1) magnetic field reference
- When expressed in terms of magnetic flux density: mG (milligauss) or nT (nano Tesla) unit usage
- When expressed in terms of magnetic field strength: A / m (ampere meter)
* 10,000 mG = 1 T, 1 mG = 100 nT
 

    

3. Electromagnetic Reduction Characteristics
1) Electric field: Inversely proportional to square of distance
2) Magnetic field: Inverse decrease in distance

4. What are the magnetic fields and the electric fields more dangerous to the human body?
The conclusion is that both must be blocked, and if both can not be blocked, it is reasonable to block one.
Since the magnetic field is inversely proportional to the distance, it is possible to create a safe environment if it is separated from the electromagnetic wave generating source.
Even if they fall at the same distance, the electric field will have a low rate of decline,
You need to know that you need it and you need to be in control.

5. Electromagnetic waves listed in cancer occurrence level: WHO standard
The International Cancer Institute (IARC), under the auspices of the World Health Organization (WHO)
Classified as cancer-causing grade 2B (Chart: quoted by Korea Broadcasting System Agency)

6. Reasons for exposure to occupational personnel are higher than those for public exposure1) Professionals are expected to be prepared for avoiding exposure to electromagnetic waves unlike ordinary people.And that it is possible to work even in high-risk exposure situations(In most workplaces, there is a distinction between electromagnetic wave exposure standards and situations where there is no standard and knowledge of workers' safetyPosition)2) In recent years, the exposure environment for electromagnetic waves has increased in the industrial field, the office, the home, and the public place.It is necessary to reduce the exposure standard of the occupational person in the working environment that does not have the concept of the worker 'Electromagnetic Intensity Standard for the Public (Notification No. 2013-118 of the Ministry of the Future Creation Science)[Source] Electric field, magnetic field, communication Comparison of high frequency electromagnetic wave exposure standards |

7. Characteristic of human body protection standard of mobile communication service (Figure: quoted by Korea Broadcasting System Agency)
-The higher the LTE high than the 2GHz band, the higher the permissible level is, from 40.23V / m to 61V / m, and the faster service is generating more electromagnetic waves.
The intensity of electromagnetic wave exposure differs depending on the communication service of the communication repeater around the living.
In addition, it is judged that the output of the communication repeater is twice as high as that of advanced countries
(This part will be analyzed as separate contents compared with the status of Canadian telecommunication repeater)

(Comparison of electromagnetic field exposure standards for magnetic fields)
Magnetic field criterion that is unclear in government departments or organizations
Future Creation Department is 833mG, Ministry of Environment is 2mG, and EMF is 2mG.
It is written at 60Hz, which uses commercial electronics, kitchen, and power equipment.
1) Natural magnetic field 0.000002mG compared to Korea Human body standard magnetic field value 833mG
(415,500,000 times higher)
2) Based on Korea 833mG magnetic field (416 times higher than Sweden 2mG magnetic field tolerance standard)
3) Private Expert Group 0.2mG Magnetic Field Acceptance Criteria Based on Korea 833mG magnetic field (4,166 times higher)

(Comparison of Exposure Standard for Electromagnetic Fields in Electric Field)
Electric field comparison chart mainly composed of 60Hz band which is mainly used for general electronic and power equipment.
1) Natural electric field 0.0001V / m Korea's body protection standard electric field value 4,166V / m
(41,660,000 times higher.)
2) Germany's 4,166V / m electric field standard (416 times higher than the 10V / m electric field limit in Germany)
3) Private Expert Group 0.3V / m Electric Field Limit Compared to Korea 4,166V / m Electric Field (13,886x High)

(Comparison of Exposure Criteria for Communication High Frequency Electromagnetic Wave)It is difficult to respond personally due to the most forcible electromagnetic wave exposure.
1) Natural high frequency 0.000001μW / m² against Korea Human body protection standard High frequency figure 10,000,000μW / m²
(10,000,000,000,000 times higher.)
2) European Parliament 100 μW / m² High Frequency Permissible Standards Korea 10,000,000 μW / m² High Frequency Reference
(100,000 times higher)
3) Private Expert Group 10 μW / m² High Frequency Standards Korea 10,000,000 μW / m² High Frequency Standards
(1,000,000 times higher)

Western Europe, Eastern Europe, and Europe.
(Quote: Report of the Government of the Netherlands)

Comparison of international policies on electromagnetic fields
(power frequency and radiofrequency fields)
Rianne Stam, Laboratory for Radiation Research, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, the NetherlandsF[1] May 2011

Exposure limits for electromagnetic waves from a German-based private group with a long tradition - from top 1. Electric field 2. Magnetic field
3. The communication is in the order of high frequency, and the right side is divided into four stages with safety, caution, beeping, and warning, and the exposure tolerance is suggested.
In most of Europe, North America, Australia, Singapore, and Hong Kong, advanced countries are citing the following data,
(Citing)
Supplement to the Standard of Building Biology Testing Methods SBM-2015
BUILDING BIOLOGY EVALUATION GUIDELINES